<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Personal survey of anti-spam tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/</link>
	<description>Michael Alderete’s Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 17:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-6087</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 May 2006 03:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-6087</guid>
		<description>Hey, I noticed you don't talk about email address encoders. I saw one at www.addressmunger.com that was pretty nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Hey, I noticed you don&#8217;t talk about email address encoders. I saw one at <a href="http://www.addressmunger.com" >http://www.addressmunger.com</a> that was pretty nice.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-5674</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2005 17:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-5674</guid>
		<description>Another vote for JunkMatcher - it uses the SpamBayes engine so far as I know, and has been working great for me. All things considered I prefer to use open-source stuff whenever possible. I just wish there were a plugin this good to use on my windows machine at the office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Another vote for JunkMatcher &#8211; it uses the SpamBayes engine so far as I know, and has been working great for me. All things considered I prefer to use open-source stuff whenever possible. I just wish there were a plugin this good to use on my windows machine at the office.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: La Vie Viennoise</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-5659</link>
		<dc:creator>La Vie Viennoise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 02:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-5659</guid>
		<description>Nice roundup. I might give SpamSieve a try, although SpamWatch is doing pretty well for me.

While on the subject of spam, there is a great service called &lt;a href="http://emailias.com"&gt;Emailias&lt;/a&gt;, which allows you to generate a unique email address for every (dubious) web transaction/newsletter. These addresses look like aldoblog@emailias.com or applepro@emailias.com.

What's neat about emailias is that you know exactly who has sold or leaked your email address when the spam starts coming in and you can turn that address off at any point without having to register for a dozen ezines (if you have only one disposable address).

I have hundreds of these emailiases now, they all work great without any downtime. I have had to disable about ten in the three years I've been using the service. And been delighted to be able to do so when the occasion arises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice roundup. I might give SpamSieve a try, although SpamWatch is doing pretty well for me.</p>

	<p>While on the subject of spam, there is a great service called <a href="http://emailias.com">Emailias</a>, which allows you to generate a unique email address for every (dubious) web transaction/newsletter. These addresses look like <a href="mailto:aldoblog@emailias.com">aldoblog@emailias.com</a> or <a href="mailto:applepro@emailias.com">applepro@emailias.com</a>.</p>

	<p>What&#8217;s neat about emailias is that you know exactly who has sold or leaked your email address when the spam starts coming in and you can turn that address off at any point without having to register for a dozen ezines (if you have only one disposable address).</p>

	<p>I have hundreds of these emailiases now, they all work great without any downtime. I have had to disable about ten in the three years I&#8217;ve been using the service. And been delighted to be able to do so when the occasion arises.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ganesh</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-4861</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganesh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 14:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-4861</guid>
		<description>Came across ur review of antispam tools for desktop/server. would suggest you try "openprotect":http://openprotect.com - its OSS, and free if you dont want KAV and commercial support. it supports sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim and installs in a jiffy !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Came across ur review of antispam tools for desktop/server. would suggest you try <a href="http://openprotect.com">openprotect</a> &#8211; its <span class="caps">OSS</span>, and free if you dont want <span class="caps">KAV</span> and commercial support. it supports sendmail, postfix, qmail and exim and installs in a jiffy !</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: samiam</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-494</link>
		<dc:creator>samiam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2005 15:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-494</guid>
		<description>You can also try the avoidance route; there is a website called spamhole.com (there are several clones around as well) that creates a temporary forwarding email address that lasts a specified time and then dumps it when the time is up. 

Its simpler than installing software if you're not too technically inclined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>You can also try the avoidance route; there is a website called spamhole.com (there are several clones around as well) that creates a temporary forwarding email address that lasts a specified time and then dumps it when the time is up. </p>

	<p>Its simpler than installing software if you&#8217;re not too technically inclined.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aldoblog   &#187; More anti-spam tools</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-297</link>
		<dc:creator>Aldoblog   &#187; More anti-spam tools</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2005 05:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-297</guid>
		<description>[...] e 			  					Note: I no longer recommend SpamNet, having found more effective tools. See my Personal Survey of Anti-Spam Tools for more details and recommendations.  	At the recommendation of a new c [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] e 			  					Note: I no longer recommend SpamNet, having found more effective tools. See my Personal Survey of Anti-Spam Tools for more details and recommendations.  	At the recommendation of a new c [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 16:55:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Joe, glad you found something that works for you! There's certainly a lot of products out there, and that's a good thing, diversity means the spammers have a lot harder time trying to break through. I haven't used JunkMatcher myself, and since this is just a survey of the tools I've personally used, I didn't mention it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Joe, glad you found something that works for you! There&#8217;s certainly a lot of products out there, and that&#8217;s a good thing, diversity means the spammers have a lot harder time trying to break through. I haven&#8217;t used JunkMatcher myself, and since this is just a survey of the tools I&#8217;ve personally used, I didn&#8217;t mention it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2005 04:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-7</guid>
		<description>Oh man.  JunkMatcher doesn't get a mention.  For people like me who use Mail.app, it's really excellent.  The combination of JunkMatcher and Mail's internal spam filter have been very, very good to me.

http://junkmatcher.sf.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Oh man.  JunkMatcher doesn&#8217;t get a mention.  For people like me who use Mail.app, it&#8217;s really excellent.  The combination of JunkMatcher and Mail&#8217;s internal spam filter have been very, very good to me.</p>

	<p><a href="http://junkmatcher.sf.net/" >http://junkmatcher.sf.net/</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: trench</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>trench</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2005 06:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Glad you figured things out.  Nice site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Glad you figured things out.  Nice site!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2005 04:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-5</guid>
		<description>OK,there were some errors with the wp-comments.php file that comes in the Kubrick distribution, which I have now fixed. So you're now seeing the comments form as the designer intended.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>OK,there were some errors with the wp-comments.php file that comes in the Kubrick distribution, which I have now fixed. So you&#8217;re now seeing the comments form as the designer intended.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2005 03:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Brian, yes, I got comments working. It was a problem in the Kubrick wp-comments.php file, which I'm working around by using the default WP 1.2.2 version. Hope to fix the problem eventually, and use the nicer Kubrick comments form...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Brian, yes, I got comments working. It was a problem in the Kubrick wp-comments.php file, which I&#8217;m working around by using the default WP 1.2.2 version. Hope to fix the problem eventually, and use the nicer Kubrick comments form&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Mikol</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2005/01/survey-of-anti-spam-tools/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Mikol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Jan 2005 23:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/410#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Thanks again for the very thorough and worthwhile review Michael! While out of the multitude of email addresses that I have, yahoo is the worst, your recommendations are very much appreciated.

Nice to see you got commenting working too! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Thanks again for the very thorough and worthwhile review Michael! While out of the multitude of email addresses that I have, yahoo is the worst, your recommendations are very much appreciated.</p>

	<p>Nice to see you got commenting working too! :-)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
