<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Aldoblog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aldoblog.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aldoblog.com</link>
	<description>Michael Alderete’s Weblog</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 08:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Another audiobook importing tool for Windows by Donna Ford</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/05/another-audiobook-importing-tool-for-windows/#comment-20670</link>
		<dc:creator>Donna Ford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 13:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/?p=621#comment-20670</guid>
		<description>Looks very promising.  Not clear from his website if the join tracks option is
done;  I use iTunes because of the ability to join tracks.  So if I understand correctly when I download this program I use its info in place of iTunes info as
I've always done per your instructions?

Lately, I've had one or two ripped books to simply cut off the end anywhere from
1 minute to longer.  Can't figure if this is a CD problem or iTunes.
Donna in AR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Looks very promising.  Not clear from his website if the join tracks option is<br />
done;  I use iTunes because of the ability to join tracks.  So if I understand correctly when I download this program I use its info in place of iTunes info as<br />
I&#8217;ve always done per your instructions?</p>

	<p>Lately, I&#8217;ve had one or two ripped books to simply cut off the end anywhere from<br />
1 minute to longer.  Can&#8217;t figure if this is a CD problem or iTunes.<br />
Donna in AR</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complete set of Harry Potter audiobooks at Amazon.com by Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20665</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20665</guid>
		<description>@Mark Gibson: I could not agree more that Stephen Fry deserves more than the 15 minutes I've given him. I'm a *huge* "Stephen Fry":http://www.stephenfry.com/ fan, and I'm quite certain I'll enjoy his performance, once I get to hear it. 

But as you point out, it's ridiculously expensive to get access to the complete set of Fry-narrated books. It's not just that the set is $275+, but the Fry performances are _impossible_ to get in the U.S. So it's Amazon.co.uk, and the big shipping charge that'll come with it. So I'm waiting for the deluxe sets, so I only have to buy them (both Fry and Dale) once. (And don't get me started on the children's vs. adult's editions of the Fry performances -- the artwork on each is amazing, and wildly different. I want both!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@Mark Gibson: I could not agree more that Stephen Fry deserves more than the 15 minutes I&#8217;ve given him. I&#8217;m a <strong>huge</strong> <a href="http://www.stephenfry.com/">Stephen Fry</a> fan, and I&#8217;m quite certain I&#8217;ll enjoy his performance, once I get to hear it. </p>

	<p>But as you point out, it&#8217;s ridiculously expensive to get access to the complete set of Fry-narrated books. It&#8217;s not just that the set is $275+, but the Fry performances are <em>impossible</em> to get in the U.S. So it&#8217;s Amazon.co.uk, and the big shipping charge that&#8217;ll come with it. So I&#8217;m waiting for the deluxe sets, so I only have to buy them (both Fry and Dale) once. (And don&#8217;t get me started on the children&#8217;s vs. adult&#8217;s editions of the Fry performances &#8212; the artwork on each is amazing, and wildly different. I want both!)</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complete set of Harry Potter audiobooks at Amazon.com by Mark Gibson</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20664</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gibson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 21:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20664</guid>
		<description>Just came across the above discussion and was suprised to hear that a different narrator had been used for the American version.  Retrospectively maybe I should not have been as the comments mad by Alderete seemed most sensible.

My only bone of contention was that of the comments made about Stephen Fry's narration which to my mind, is absolutely brilliant.  Hence the many audiobook awards he has been given.  Please US readers, give him every chance as 15 minutes does not give him the respect he deserves.

Having said all that, I will have to listen to Jim Dale's narration now.  This is going to cost a fortune!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Just came across the above discussion and was suprised to hear that a different narrator had been used for the American version.  Retrospectively maybe I should not have been as the comments mad by Alderete seemed most sensible.</p>

	<p>My only bone of contention was that of the comments made about Stephen Fry&#8217;s narration which to my mind, is absolutely brilliant.  Hence the many audiobook awards he has been given.  Please US readers, give him every chance as 15 minutes does not give him the respect he deserves.</p>

	<p>Having said all that, I will have to listen to Jim Dale&#8217;s narration now.  This is going to cost a fortune!</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Mozilla Thunderbird still doesn&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; anti-virus protection by LikesGadgets</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2007/08/thunderbird-still-doesnt-get-anti-virus-protection/#comment-20661</link>
		<dc:creator>LikesGadgets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/593#comment-20661</guid>
		<description>I've got to pipe in here.  About two years ago I started to make efforts to get off Microsoft products for new computers.  For various reasons, I still need to base some of my PCs (and I have a dozen or so) on Windows (XP of course, nothanks to Vista).

I did a test-import of nearly 10 years of accumulated mail from Outlook into Thunderbird 1.5, and it was successful, turning a 900MB PST into a 1.2GB profile folder.  Space is cheap.  I cleaned up my multi-account set-up a bit, and have since upgraded to Thunderbird 2.x and then switched to Portable Thunderbird.  I recently added the Lightning extensions and synchronize my contacts and calendar using scheduleworld.

I am, as such, a "power-user" of Thunderbird.  I'm also a programmer by profession and know my way around various OSs.

My AV of choice is ClamWin for Windows and ClamAV for Linux.

And no, I don't have *any* virus protection for my Thunderbird.  To be fair, I really don't receive more than one or two attachments a month, and I can't even remember when I last received an executable of any type in the mail.

However, I also use Firefox and have it configured to scan downloaded files using ClamWin.  If there was a reasonable way to scan incoming messages in TB, I would configure it to do that.  However, there is not, and I think that is Michael's point.  Matt seems to misunderstand this.  

The Mozilla folks are doing a bang-up job on Firefox and Thunderbird, but to not have a *single* configuration example for TB+AV for *any* AV program is a gross omission that borders on negligence.  And it's even more so for the fact that beyond a number of "free" AV solution, there's a very solid open-source program available.  And -- Hello Matt -- ClamAV even updates virus definitions automatically!

All that aside, I think the best solution for email virus protection is to scan at the server level.  My ISP uses an installation of ASSP which not only scrutinizes the headers, but also greylists senders (thus delaying or rejection mail from "drones") and scans attachments.  Local POP3/SMTP proxies were fine and well a couple of years ago, but who uses unencrypted POP3 anymore?

So, Michael -- yes, it's a shame Mozilla doesn't even document a simple antivirus configuration.  It'll hurt Thunderbird adoption in the long run.

Matt -- yes, "security" is unknown to the average computer user these days.  Even to some of the "above average" users, it's difficult.  I recall a programmer of mine who got his development machine infected and was about to roll out an infected exe to a few hundred users.  That's exactly the reason why it security has to be made available to those users... and that was the point this blog post is making.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve got to pipe in here.  About two years ago I started to make efforts to get off Microsoft products for new computers.  For various reasons, I still need to base some of my PCs (and I have a dozen or so) on Windows (XP of course, nothanks to Vista).</p>

	<p>I did a test-import of nearly 10 years of accumulated mail from Outlook into Thunderbird 1.5, and it was successful, turning a 900MB <span class="caps">PST</span> into a 1.2GB profile folder.  Space is cheap.  I cleaned up my multi-account set-up a bit, and have since upgraded to Thunderbird 2.x and then switched to Portable Thunderbird.  I recently added the Lightning extensions and synchronize my contacts and calendar using scheduleworld.</p>

	<p>I am, as such, a &#8220;power-user&#8221; of Thunderbird.  I&#8217;m also a programmer by profession and know my way around various OSs.</p>

	<p>My AV of choice is ClamWin for Windows and ClamAV for Linux.</p>

	<p>And no, I don&#8217;t have <strong>any</strong> virus protection for my Thunderbird.  To be fair, I really don&#8217;t receive more than one or two attachments a month, and I can&#8217;t even remember when I last received an executable of any type in the mail.</p>

	<p>However, I also use Firefox and have it configured to scan downloaded files using ClamWin.  If there was a reasonable way to scan incoming messages in TB, I would configure it to do that.  However, there is not, and I think that is Michael&#8217;s point.  Matt seems to misunderstand this.  </p>

	<p>The Mozilla folks are doing a bang-up job on Firefox and Thunderbird, but to not have a <strong>single</strong> configuration example for TB+AV for <strong>any</strong> AV program is a gross omission that borders on negligence.  And it&#8217;s even more so for the fact that beyond a number of &#8220;free&#8221; AV solution, there&#8217;s a very solid open-source program available.  And &#8212; Hello Matt &#8212; ClamAV even updates virus definitions automatically!</p>

	<p>All that aside, I think the best solution for email virus protection is to scan at the server level.  My <span class="caps">ISP</span> uses an installation of <span class="caps">ASSP</span> which not only scrutinizes the headers, but also greylists senders (thus delaying or rejection mail from &#8220;drones&#8221;) and scans attachments.  Local POP3/SMTP proxies were fine and well a couple of years ago, but who uses unencrypted POP3 anymore?</p>

	<p>So, Michael &#8212; yes, it&#8217;s a shame Mozilla doesn&#8217;t even document a simple antivirus configuration.  It&#8217;ll hurt Thunderbird adoption in the long run.</p>

	<p>Matt &#8212; yes, &#8220;security&#8221; is unknown to the average computer user these days.  Even to some of the &#8220;above average&#8221; users, it&#8217;s difficult.  I recall a programmer of mine who got his development machine infected and was about to roll out an infected exe to a few hundred users.  That&#8217;s exactly the reason why it security has to be made available to those users&#8230; and that was the point this blog post is making.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Importing audiobooks with iTunes 7 by Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2006/10/importing-audiobooks-with-itunes-7/#comment-20660</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 09:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/561#comment-20660</guid>
		<description>@Jim: It's pretty hard to guess what's happening from your description. The first two steps in the instructions have worked without change in iTunes for many versions. Perhaps if you write up a more complete description, possibly including screenshots, and send it to the email address I include in the sidebar, I can try to help you further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@Jim: It&#8217;s pretty hard to guess what&#8217;s happening from your description. The first two steps in the instructions have worked without change in iTunes for many versions. Perhaps if you write up a more complete description, possibly including screenshots, and send it to the email address I include in the sidebar, I can try to help you further.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Importing audiobooks with iTunes 7 by Jim Bechdel</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2006/10/importing-audiobooks-with-itunes-7/#comment-20659</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Bechdel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 14:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/blog/561#comment-20659</guid>
		<description>I'm on a mac running iTunes 7. I can' get past step 2. When I do Join CD Tracks each file does not show up as Track 01 also when I select submit CD info the CD dialog window won't show up. I don think iTunes is retriveviing the titles for each track. I using the Latest Leopard 10.5.2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m on a mac running iTunes 7. I can&#8217; get past step 2. When I do Join CD Tracks each file does not show up as Track 01 also when I select submit CD info the CD dialog window won&#8217;t show up. I don think iTunes is retriveviing the titles for each track. I using the Latest Leopard 10.5.2.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to join multiple tracks into a single audiobook file by Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20651</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 18:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20651</guid>
		<description>@Dan: Yes, there are limits. I believe the fundamental limits are due to underlying limits in the QuickTime format, having to do with a maximum number of samples in one file. This means that, at the lower sample rate that I recommend in my "Optimal iTunes Import Settings for Audiobooks":http://aldoblog.com/audiobooks/itunes/import-settings/ article, an audiobook track can be longer than if you imported it at the default, much higher sample rate.

However, there are also defects in software/firmware on the iPod, which limit track lengths to quite a bit less than the theoretical maximum. The longest tracks in my collection are just under 17 hours long.

But I wouldn't even go that far these days. Audiobook Builder limits you to 12 hour tracks, and will automatically split up a longer book into tracks no longer than that. The developers of Audiobook Builder have done a lot more technical research than I have on the _practical_ limits in length, and so I trust that's the right maximum length. So your 40 hour book should be split across four tracks.

And really, that's a good idea anyway. That way as you finish a part of the book, you can remove that section from your iPod, saving space for other books. If it was one huge track, you wouldn't be able reclaim the space until the very last word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@Dan: Yes, there are limits. I believe the fundamental limits are due to underlying limits in the QuickTime format, having to do with a maximum number of samples in one file. This means that, at the lower sample rate that I recommend in my <a href="http://aldoblog.com/audiobooks/itunes/import-settings/">Optimal iTunes Import Settings for Audiobooks</a> article, an audiobook track can be longer than if you imported it at the default, much higher sample rate.</p>

	<p>However, there are also defects in software/firmware on the iPod, which limit track lengths to quite a bit less than the theoretical maximum. The longest tracks in my collection are just under 17 hours long.</p>

	<p>But I wouldn&#8217;t even go that far these days. Audiobook Builder limits you to 12 hour tracks, and will automatically split up a longer book into tracks no longer than that. The developers of Audiobook Builder have done a lot more technical research than I have on the <em>practical</em> limits in length, and so I trust that&#8217;s the right maximum length. So your 40 hour book should be split across four tracks.</p>

	<p>And really, that&#8217;s a good idea anyway. That way as you finish a part of the book, you can remove that section from your iPod, saving space for other books. If it was one huge track, you wouldn&#8217;t be able reclaim the space until the very last word.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to join multiple tracks into a single audiobook file by Dan</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20650</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 15:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20650</guid>
		<description>I've heard hints that there is a limit to the length of a single audio book track in itunes.  Or maybe that it causes some issues.  Is there truly a limit or issue?  I would like to just like to have my audio book in one huge track/file.  Will my 40 hour audio book track cause an issue?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve heard hints that there is a limit to the length of a single audio book track in itunes.  Or maybe that it causes some issues.  Is there truly a limit or issue?  I would like to just like to have my audio book in one huge track/file.  Will my 40 hour audio book track cause an issue?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Where is TiVo Transfer? by Leo</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2007/11/where-is-tivo-transfer/#comment-20648</link>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 06:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2007/11/where-is-tivo-transfer/#comment-20648</guid>
		<description>regarding missing Tivo Transfer, I followed your email and got to the "go to the 'Extras' and click Tivo Transfer from there. I have the Tivo transfer image there but then get the message..."Tivo Transfer could not be found...."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>regarding missing Tivo Transfer, I followed your email and got to the &#8220;go to the &#8216;Extras&#8217; and click Tivo Transfer from there. I have the Tivo transfer image there but then get the message&#8230;&#8220;Tivo Transfer could not be found&#8230;.&#8221;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complete set of Harry Potter audiobooks at Amazon.com by Jensenly</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20645</link>
		<dc:creator>Jensenly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:02:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20645</guid>
		<description>Very much looking forward to your review of both box sets somewhere down the line......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Very much looking forward to your review of both box sets somewhere down the line&#8230;&#8230;</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Complete set of Harry Potter audiobooks at Amazon.com by Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20644</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 23:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/complete-set-of-harry-potter-audiobooks-at-amazoncom/#comment-20644</guid>
		<description>@Jensenly: It seems like it's not unusual (and perhaps common) for audiobooks to have one narrator for the recording released in the US and a different one in the UK. I suspect it has to do with accents; what is pleasing or understandable to the British ear may not be so to an American. 

There are also definitely textual differences, at least in the Harry Potter novels, but they're mostly trivial. But they necessitate extra time in the recording studio, additional pre- and post-production effort, etc. I imagine at that point doing an entirely different performance isn't as huge a deal as it might seem, especially if there are different aesthetic goals for each.

I have listened to only the first 15 minutes of the Stephen Fry performance of HP #1, so it's very hard for me to judge his qualities as a narrator for the series. Fry's performance seemed more understated than the Jim Dale recordings, which I love. While I very often prefer the more subtle sensibilities of British vs American actors, in the case of the fantastical and whimsical Harry Potter books, I suspect that Jim Dale's more energetic narration will be my preference.

I plan to purchase complete box sets of both the Dale and Fry performances, though, and will give them a complete review once I've listened to them thoroughly (which means it'll be a year or two before this gets done).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@Jensenly: It seems like it&#8217;s not unusual (and perhaps common) for audiobooks to have one narrator for the recording released in the US and a different one in the UK. I suspect it has to do with accents; what is pleasing or understandable to the British ear may not be so to an American. </p>

	<p>There are also definitely textual differences, at least in the Harry Potter novels, but they&#8217;re mostly trivial. But they necessitate extra time in the recording studio, additional pre- and post-production effort, etc. I imagine at that point doing an entirely different performance isn&#8217;t as huge a deal as it might seem, especially if there are different aesthetic goals for each.</p>

	<p>I have listened to only the first 15 minutes of the Stephen Fry performance of HP #1, so it&#8217;s very hard for me to judge his qualities as a narrator for the series. Fry&#8217;s performance seemed more understated than the Jim Dale recordings, which I love. While I very often prefer the more subtle sensibilities of British vs American actors, in the case of the fantastical and whimsical Harry Potter books, I suspect that Jim Dale&#8217;s more energetic narration will be my preference.</p>

	<p>I plan to purchase complete box sets of both the Dale and Fry performances, though, and will give them a complete review once I&#8217;ve listened to them thoroughly (which means it&#8217;ll be a year or two before this gets done).</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to join multiple tracks into a single audiobook file by Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20643</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20643</guid>
		<description>@Paul: Sounds like you need to check out "the FAQs":/audiobooks/itunes/frequently-asked-questions/, though if you've set the "skip when shuffling" setting for a track, it really shouldn't be included. Are you sure you've changed that setting for *all* your audiobook tracks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@Paul: Sounds like you need to check out <a href="/audiobooks/itunes/frequently-asked-questions/">the <span class="caps">FAQ</span>s</a>, though if you&#8217;ve set the &#8220;skip when shuffling&#8221; setting for a track, it really shouldn&#8217;t be included. Are you sure you&#8217;ve changed that setting for <strong>all</strong> your audiobook tracks?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to join multiple tracks into a single audiobook file by Alderete</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20642</link>
		<dc:creator>Alderete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 18:19:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20642</guid>
		<description>@Zenjamin: I'm sure the iPod Shuffle _can_ be used for audiobooks, and make work well for some people. And I would imagine that having proper chapter marks, etc. from Audiobook Builder makes it easier to use. But I think it's a rare person or situation where the iPod shuffle is the best solution for audiobooks. For most people the nano is a lot better. Lots of details in "Which iPod Should I Buy?":/audiobooks/ipod-recommendations/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>@Zenjamin: I&#8217;m sure the iPod Shuffle <em>can</em> be used for audiobooks, and make work well for some people. And I would imagine that having proper chapter marks, etc. from Audiobook Builder makes it easier to use. But I think it&#8217;s a rare person or situation where the iPod shuffle is the best solution for audiobooks. For most people the nano is a lot better. Lots of details in <a href="/audiobooks/ipod-recommendations/">Which iPod Should I Buy?</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to join multiple tracks into a single audiobook file by Paul</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20641</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20641</guid>
		<description>Is there a way to prevent the audiobook files from showing up in the "songs" list on the ipod? Sometimes I enjoy just having all my songs on shuffle, and every now and then the audiobook comes up. They are already checked for "skip when shuffling", however they still show up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Is there a way to prevent the audiobook files from showing up in the &#8220;songs&#8221; list on the ipod? Sometimes I enjoy just having all my songs on shuffle, and every now and then the audiobook comes up. They are already checked for &#8220;skip when shuffling&#8221;, however they still show up.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to join multiple tracks into a single audiobook file by Zenjamin</title>
		<link>http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20639</link>
		<dc:creator>Zenjamin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 01:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aldoblog.com/2008/01/how-to-join-multiple-tracks-into-a-single-audiobook-file/#comment-20639</guid>
		<description>I also have a Shffule, and with audiobook builder, it is the best possible audiobook MP3 player IMO. True, the lack of a screen and a scrool wheeel makes it difficult for you to know what chapter you are on, but what does that matter?

I was at work today (washing dishes to pay for college) and I had my Shffule attached to the outside of my pocket. and I was able to, with one hand, while carrying a load of pans, reach down, pause the shffule, rewind it, control the volume, ect... all intuitively without stopping what i was doing. 

and now, with all of the audiobook files joined, I will be able to switch just as effortsly between mu music any my audio book by turning on the shuffle feature when the music hits me, and just hit the play button three times to go to the last bookmark in my audiobook as it will be the first thing in my playlist. with a nano, I would have had to stop what i was doing and take the thing out of my pocket. really, navigating the thing is verry intuitive once you get used to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I also have a Shffule, and with audiobook builder, it is the best possible audiobook MP3 player <span class="caps">IMO</span>. True, the lack of a screen and a scrool wheeel makes it difficult for you to know what chapter you are on, but what does that matter?</p>

	<p>I was at work today (washing dishes to pay for college) and I had my Shffule attached to the outside of my pocket. and I was able to, with one hand, while carrying a load of pans, reach down, pause the shffule, rewind it, control the volume, ect&#8230; all intuitively without stopping what i was doing. </p>

	<p>and now, with all of the audiobook files joined, I will be able to switch just as effortsly between mu music any my audio book by turning on the shuffle feature when the music hits me, and just hit the play button three times to go to the last bookmark in my audiobook as it will be the first thing in my playlist. with a nano, I would have had to stop what i was doing and take the thing out of my pocket. really, navigating the thing is verry intuitive once you get used to it.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
