Vegas!

This last weekend Rochelle and I went to visit friends who moved to Las Vegas four months ago. Our friends, now officially locals, took us on a whirlwind tour of their favorites, mostly bars.

This last weekend Rochelle and I went to visit friends who moved to Las Vegas four months ago. While they’re still looking for permanent work so they can apply for home loans, and settle in permanently, they’ve definitely scoped out the lesser-known parts of the city.

One of our evenings included visiting the Double Down, an infamous bar where no one ever gets thrown out. (We have two friends who have managed to do it anyway, including one of our hosts.) They serve a drink with a bad reputation, “ass juice”, which is basically the dregs of all their bottles. $1 a shot, and it’s different (tasting, color, etc.) every night. It’s vile and evil, and I wouldn’t drink anything else when I’m there.

When we awoke the next day, we wanted to burn the clothes we’d worn the night before — the smell of cigarette smoke had penetrated them so deeply we thought we were back in the bar. Rochelle and I have a bet whether it ever comes out.

The best find was Makino, an all-you-can-eat sushi place. Normally these unlimited sushi buffets are horrible, with minimal amounts of the good sushi, which is snapped up in seconds when it’s put out. Not so Makino. We were awed by the quantity, quality, and variety of the sushi. My first plate alone had more than $15 worth of sushi on it. I ate two more after that (those were smaller, though). The photos are up, you can see for yourself.

Most disappointing was the champagne bar in Paris (the casino). You would think they’d be able to get it right — the place cost millions of dollars to build — but no. In reality, most of their customers probably aren’t that discriminating, and the connoisseurs go to a good restaurant. Our tasting flights were not cold enough, and several of the champagnes were somewhat flat. Completely unacceptable, if you care about these things. By way of comparison, in France we almost always were served from freshly opened bottles, and even watched some hosts pour bottles down the sink rather than serve them past their peak.

We decided that if we ever went there again (they did have a nice selection of champagnes by the glass), we would sit at the bar, to supervise the pouring of our glasses and push back the unacceptable ones.

Taittinger

Our first Maison de Champagne, or House of Champagne, was Taittinger. “Maison” is a term generally reserved for the larger champagne producers, and most of the major houses give tours of their extensive tunnels, and take justifiable pride in them. Our tour at Taittinger was fascinating, descending into the tunnels and seeing more champagne than we ever imagined existed in one place at a time.

Our first Maison de Champagne, or House of Champagne, was Taittinger. “Maison” is a term generally reserved for the larger champagne producers, and while Taittinger is far from the largest, they’re still huge, producing about 5 million bottles of champagne a year.

Taittinger is one of the many houses to take advantage of the chalk quarries dug by the Romans for building material in and under what became Reims. These quarry pits follow a formula, and are remarkably similar from house to house. The pits are connected by tunnels, and have additional galleries added, where racks upon racks of champagne are stored. The excavations, or caves de champagne, are quite cool (virtually every tour guide had a cloak to wear when visiting the caves) and humid, which creates the perfect conditions for aging champagne.

Champagne is aged in the bottle, for varying lengths of time depending on the house, and while Taittinger produces about 5 million bottles in a single year, at any given time the tunnels, pits, and galleries hold nearly 20 million bottles. Most of the major houses give tours of their extensive tunnels, and take justifiable pride in them. Our tour at Taittinger was fascinating, descending into the tunnels and seeing more champagne than we ever imagined in one place at a time.

In the photos we took you can see some of the features of the caves, and the use to which the maisons now make of them, as well as ancient carvings in the chalk, which pre-date the maisons by centuries (see the photos).

One of the most interesting photos is of the various sized vessels in which champagne is bottled. Rochelle is in the photo for scale, and you can plainly see that the largest bottle is nearly as big as she is!

Here’s an interesting tidbit: the best size bottle to buy champagne in is the magnum (1500 milliliters, or the size of two regular bottles); the volume inside the bottle is larger compared to the area out which the gasses which make champagne sparkling can escape. It stays more sparkly than champagne in smaller bottles.

You would think that would mean that the larger the bottle the better, but no, most houses don’t normally bottle champagne in sizes larger than the magnum, because they are too large and heavy to handle, require special machinery, etc. When they need to fill larger bottles for a special order, they actually decant magnums into the larger vessel, which obviously causes some of the fizz to dissipate.

It’s still pretty damn good; when I worked at Be we opened a giant bottle of Veuve Clicquot at one summer picnic, shortly after we went public, and while I drank my share, others did not, which surfaces another problem with these big damn bottles: what do you do if you don’t finish it? (The answer: don’t open it if your guests won’t finish it, because it’s impossible to preserve.)
Taittinger (Photos)
Champagne Bottles (Photo)

L’Assiette Champenoise

While our trip to France began poorly, fortunately for our sanity, we quickly recovered. Driving from Charles De Gaulle to our hotel just outside of Reims took about two hours. And our hotel, L’Assiette Champenoise, was wonderful.

While our trip to France began poorly, fortunately for our sanity, we quickly recovered. Driving from Charles De Gaulle to our hotel just outside of Reims took about two hours, with only one wrong turn, quickly realized and corrected.

And our hotel, L’Assiette Champenoise, was wonderful. We checked in, dragged our bags to our room, and headed straight for the bar (we needed, and deserved, it).

Settling in at a table in the hotel bar, we ordered glasses of (what else?) champagne, and reviewed the hotel restaurant’s menu. We had reservations for dinner there the next night, and had originally not planned to eat there more than once. But it was also much later than we’d planned to get in, and we had no energy for going out to find something else to eat. Plus, the menu looked really good.

So, we decided to eat. We were seated immediately, and had a wonderful meal. Regrettably, in our addled state, we forgot to bring our camera, and so did not photograph our meal. All I can tell you is I started with a wonderful slice of terrine of foie gras, that it was outstanding, and that it was my favorite part of the meal. (Get used to this. My favorite thing is always the foie gras.)

Our dinner was accompanied by a bottle of the same delightful champagne we’d started in the bar with. It had a beautiful ruby hue, a much deeper red than most rosé champagnes usually take. Again regrettably, we neglected to write down the name, and have only the vaguest idea of what it was.

Sated and much more relaxed, we tottered off to bed — and (once again) regrettably forgot to put the Do Not Disturb sign on our door.

Rant in Favor of Unix

I know that many people, especially the folks clinging to Mac OS 9, are not fond of, or particularly interested in learning to use, the Unix layer of Mac OS X. Unix is not pretty, but it is powerful. It’s baroque, but it’s incredibly well-designed. It’s not intuitive, but once you know it, it’s far faster than the GUI for many tasks.

You may as well get used to it, Unix is a part of your life if you stay with the Mac. If you can get past your initial phobia, and treat it as something exciting to explore, a new thing to learn, an opportunity to be an expert, you will become more powerful than you could possibly imagine (to steal a quotation). Neal Stephenson’s article, In the Beginning was the Command Line, is a fun look at this concept.

Personally, I love the command line, though I wish I was more expert. I get by pretty well, but seek to achieve guru status in the next two years.

Jaguar Upgrade: Belated Introduction

This is the seventh in a series of posts I’m writing about my upgrade to Mac OS X 10.2 “Jaguar”. This article provides a belated introduction to the series, with a table of contents and summaries of the articles, and an introduction to the author.

This is the seventh in a series of posts I’m writing about my upgrade to Mac OS X 10.2 “Jaguar”.

Series Overview

  • Belated Introduction
    What is this series, who am I, and why am I qualified to tell you anything. (This posting.)
  • Prequel
    Just a short post that I thought served as an introduction, until I re-read it today.
  • Install Options
    Describes the four different upgrade options available from the Jaguar Installation CD, with some details of what they’ll do.
  • What Gets Archived
    Details what files and directories get archived when you use the Archive & Install option to perform a “clean install” upgrade to Jaguar.
  • Post-Install Setup
    There’s a fair amount of work to do after an Archive & Install; this is the first set of things I did, focused on the Mac side of things.
  • Post-Install Unix Stuff, Part I
    There’s work to do on the Unix side, too, if you’re using tools like MySQL and PHP. This post is mostly about fixing MySQL.
  • Post Install Unix Stuff, Part II
    More Unix configuration work, this time for PHP and Apache.

I realized today that I really didn’t provide a good introduction to this series, what the purpose was, etc. So I’m going to pause in the regular postings, and start at the beginning.

I’ve been a Mac user continuously since 1984, and have used virtually every version of Mac OS. My first job was doing end-user computer support for more than 100 Mac users, and I worked there in various roles for more than five years. I’ve even sold Macs, as an Apple Student Rep in college. I’ve also used Windows, mostly Windows 2000. I’ve used Unix quite a bit, mostly since I got into doing web development, and became frustrated with the limitations of Mac OS as a reliable server. And I worked at Be Incorporated for three years, where I fell in love with the idea of an operating system that effectively married a beautiful GUI with a powerful Unix-like subsystem.

So, I’m hardly a typical Mac OS X user, or at least, hardly a typical Mac OS X user who is “switching” from the Classic version to the New version. I love Unix, and I’m not afraid to admit it in public. For me, Mac OS X is a beautiful piece of work. Deeply flawed (file meta-data, anyone?), but still brilliant. I switched from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X 10.1 shortly after it came out, and I can literally count on my fingers and toes the number of times I’ve booted back into Mac OS 9 proper since then — most of those to run DiskWarrior.

My goal in writing these postings was to start to develop the body of knowledge that I once had for Mac OS Classic. In particular, the “best practice” of doing a clean install when upgrading to a major new release of Mac OS was something I understood extremely well.

But with Mac OS X, the rules have all changed. The core operating system is still stored in a directory named “System”, but that directory is vastly more structured and complicated. And there are dozens of other places where system components and preferences are located, to say nothing of the many more locations where third-party software can be installed.

It’s a brand new world, and while I was sure that doing a clean install was still a best practice, I no longer knew how to perform a clean install, or at least do one efficiently. My Jaguar upgrade was to be my first, and I not only didn’t want to lose a scrap of hard-won knowledge, I wanted to share it with others, and learn from them, so that I could get up the knowledge curve quickly.

So I started these postings. Hopefully they are moderately interesting or useful. This series isn’t supposed to be a review of Jaguar. Everyone else is doing that, much better than I could. This is working knowledge, and I hope you’ll read and learn, and share with me the things you know that I don’t.

Final thought: I don’t talk about it in the articles themselves, but I made a total of four full-system backups before I started. Two of them were stored off-site. Yes, I’m paranoid, but with good reason. Back up your system before you upgrade.

Hello, MacDevCenter Visitors!

Um, gulp! These little postings have been put on the front page of O’Reilly’s MacDevCenter, one of the premier technical news sites for Mac OS X. I can see the results in my Apache logs as I type this! Hello, MacDevCenter visitors!

O'Reilly network macdevcenter Wow! These little postings have been put on the front page of O’Reilly’s MacDevCenter, one of the premier technical news sites for Mac OS X. I can see the results in my Apache logs as I type this. Gulp!

Hello, MacDevCenter visitors!

More Food!

I posted more of our food photos, and Rochelle and I both wrote more commentary (Pancita’s #3 still needs more commentary, working on it). In total, five new restaurant experiences in our San Francisco Food photo series.

I posted more of our food photos, and Rochelle and I both wrote more commentary (Pancita’s #3 still needs more commentary, working on it). In total, five new restaurant experiences in our San Francisco Food photo series.

More Anti-Spam Tools

At the recommendation of a new co-worker, I recently installed Cloudmark’s SpamNet add-in for Microsoft Outlook, the e-mail client I’m using at Persistence. If you’re using Microsoft Outlook on Windows (as I have to at work), this tool should be a no-brainer.

Note: I no longer recommend SpamNet, having found more effective tools. See my Personal Survey of Anti-Spam Tools for more details and recommendations.

At the recommendation of a new co-worker, I recently installed Cloudmark’s SpamNet add-in for Microsoft Outlook, the e-mail client I’m using at Persistence.

The plug-in adds new capabilities to Outlook, enabling it to scan each message as it’s downloaded, and determine if it’s spam or not. If it’s spam, it’s sent to your Spam mailbox, rather than your Inbox. This lets you review the caught spams at another time, to verify that only spam has been filed there.

The most interesting part of SpamNet is the way it detects spam. It plugs into a P2P (peer-to-peer) network of spam reporters. Everyone who’s part of the network reports spam when it gets through their filters. After a couple people have reported any given spam, the network “learns” what that spam looks like, and will filter it for everyone else. So SpamNet “learns” about spam from the collective experience of everyone using SpamNet (currently about 40,000 people). This makes SpamNet probably the most effective anti-spam tool out there. There’s more to it than that, but not much, and you can read all about it on the Cloudmark web site.

Oh, yeah, the price tag. SpamNet is free for individual use. If you’re using Microsoft Outlook on Windows (as I have to at work), this tool should be a no-brainer.

But, there’s the catch. Today SpamNet supports only Outlook on Windows. If you use Outlook Express, you’ll be supported soon. If you’re using Netscape, or Eudora, or a Macintosh, you’re SOL at the moment.

Another Mouse Story

Logitech’s Cordless Optical Mouse just may be the perfect computer mouse, whether you have a PC or a Mac.

I had been using Kensington (ADB) mice with my computers for years when I finally upgraded to a new Mac G4 with USB. I was really looking forward to Apple’s new optical mouse, after 10+ years of using micro-tweezers to clean out my mechanical mouse every few weeks.

I gave the Apple Pro Mouse a workout for a couple months, and finally decided it was hurting me. The cable is too short, even when connected directly to my keyboard, and because of its rocker switch (instead of a proper button), picking it up with the mouse still down (when I ran out of desk space) was quite stressful on my hand. I also found I hated going back to a single mouse button — it’s inexcusable that Apple doesn’t make a multi-button mouse.

Rochelle had been using a Microsoft IntelliMouse for almost two years, and liked it well enough, but I found it too big for my hands. I like to be able to actually enfold the mouse with my hand, not just lay my hand upon it and move it around. I’m just a Grabber, I guess.

I finally found the Logitech Cordless Optical Mouse (not the MouseMan, the product name is exactly as written). It’s a lovely shape, symmetric for Lefties as well as Righties, and fits my hand beautifully.

It’s got two buttons and a scroll wheel (which can also act as a third button), and works with Mac OS X without additional driver software (I haven’t even tried Logitech’s software yet). It’s also PC-compatible.

What’s more, I found “Cordless” to be the most surprisingly ergonomic part of it. I’m not managing a cable every time I mouse around anymore, it’s truly liberating. The batteries last for a few months at a time (I’ve replaced mine once). Wireless mice is the only way to go, I’m now convinced.

I liked my mouse so much Rochelle decided she wanted one, too, and it has now replaced the IntelliMouse on her PC.

Hopefully this mouse story was less gross than some of the previous ones!

Tequilapalooza 10, Michael and Rochelle 14

Sunday was Tommy’s tenth annual Tequilapalooza, an afternoon celebration of tequila, available only to those who have achieved a Master’s rating or better in Tommy’s tasting club. Naturally, Rochelle and I were there.

Sunday was Tommy’s tenth annual Tequilapalooza, an afternoon celebration of tequila, available only to those who have achieved a Master’s rating or better in Tommy’s Blue Agave tasting club.

Naturally, Rochelle and I were there. (And we brought friends.)

The way it works, you buy tickets in advance, and then exchange the event tickets for drink tickets. Every person gets seven drink tickets. Which means seven margaritas, or seven shots, all doubles (because that’s the way they pour at Tommy’s).

Yes, we did take a cab from the event.

Tommy’s is internationally recognized as one of the premier places on earth to drink tequila, and has been featured in Time Magazine and CNN, among other places, so it’s with great pride that we drank ourselves stupid with the Tequila Masters.

36 Wines in 3 Hours

On Saturday we drove up to Copia, and attended their “Tour de France” walk-around wine tasting. There were 39 French wines in one room, and the only ones we didn’t taste were the ones they ran out of before we got there. Cost of the event? $15.

On Saturday we drove up to Copia, and attended their “Tour de France” walk-around wine tasting. There were 39 French wines in one room, and the only ones we didn’t taste were the ones they ran out of before we got there. Most wines had multiple bottles, but a few had just one, including a 1er Cru Burgundy that I am terribly sad to have missed.

36 wines in 3 hours works out to 12 tastes per hour…if you’re pacing yourself. I think many people didn’t have the stamina to go the whole distance, the room was a lot less full at the end, but we managed.

You’d think that 36 tastes would have added up to enough to make us drunk, but we were spitting (some of the time), so it was less booze than it sounds like. Of course, I’m pretty sure we were not tasting the final bottles at the same level as the first few. And we did end up going to a liquor store next door and buying $300 in wine…

All in all, a great day. I highly recommend joining Copia, or just visiting. They have a great range of programs that are definitely worth checking out. We paid $15 each to taste 36 quality imported wines, a huge bargain.